SCGOP disqualifies delegates for donating to Robert F Kennedy Jr.

SCGOP disqualifies 5 members for donating to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s campaign, sparking internal party turmoil and accusations of retaliation.

The South Carolina Republican Party recently made a controversial decision to disqualify five members, including two delegates to the national convention, from voting due to their contributions to independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s presidential campaign. The members were informed they were ineligible to vote at the party's convention after it was revealed they had each paid $500 to attend a dinner where Kennedy was speaking. Kennedy, a prominent conspiracy theorist and heir to the Kennedy political dynasty, was seen as a potential spoiler to President Joe Biden and drew support from both liberals and conservatives.

However, as Kennedy's campaign progressed, tensions rose within the Republican Party. Supporters of Donald Trump, including Trump's son, criticized Kennedy as a possible threat to Republican votes after he announced policy positions that clashed with Republican values. The disqualified members claimed they were unaware they were donating to Kennedy's campaign and believed their contributions were for the cost of attending the dinner. They were later refunded by the Kennedy campaign, with each citing misunderstandings.

State GOP Chairman Drew McKissick emphasized party rules that prohibit officers, delegates, or alternates from endorsing or financially supporting non-Republican candidates. While an exemption exists for donations made when there is no clear Republican nominee, McKissick argued that the spirit of the rule, rather than the letter, should guide decisions. The disqualified members and their supporters viewed the party's actions as retaliation for their opposition to party leadership and support for alternative candidates.

The SCGOP has faced internal turmoil between traditional conservatives and a more hardline, populist wing, leading to conflicts in various counties. The disqualified members were involved in activism and efforts to challenge election results within the party. McKissick defended the decision to disqualify them, stating that party rules must be upheld to maintain the integrity of the party and its leadership. The individuals who elect party leaders have a right to expect adherence to party rules and principles, regardless of personal beliefs or affiliations.

Share With Others