Liz Magill resigns: What's next for Harvard president? All you need to know

University presidents face scrutiny over handling of antisemitism on college campuses during Israel-Hamas conflict. Mixed reactions to resignation of Penn president.

In a recent statement, Bok shared that Magill expressed gratitude for her time as president, stating, "It has been my privilege to serve as President of this remarkable institution," highlighting her collaboration with various stakeholders to advance Penn's vital missions.

Magill, along with Harvard President Claudine Gay and MIT President Sally Kornbluth, testified before the House Committee on Education and the Workforce on antisemitism issues. The examination revolved around their responses to incidents on college campuses during the Israel-Hamas war.

Colleges reported a surge in antisemitic incidents amid the Israel-Hamas conflict, leading to a contentious atmosphere. The focus of the inquiry, particularly on Magill, Gay, and Kornbluth, was their handling of calls for the genocide of Jews and whether it violated their institutions' code of conduct against bullying and harassment.

Despite persistent questioning from Rep. Elise Stefanik, the university leaders provided carefully worded responses. Magill, pressed on the issue, acknowledged, "If the speech turns into conduct, it can be harassment. Yes."

Magill faced criticism not only for her testimony but also for allowing a Palestinian literary festival on Penn's campus, leading to accusations of antisemitism against some speakers.

Stefanik deemed their answers "unacceptable and antisemitic," urging the university presidents to resign. After Magill's resignation, Stefanik shared on X, "One down. Two to go." House Committee Chair Virginia Foxx announced a formal investigation, and Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro criticized Magill's testimony.

Magill responded to the backlash through a video message on X, acknowledging her oversight and emphasizing the evil nature of calls for genocide. She called for the clarification and evaluation of the school's policies.

The fate of Harvard President Claudine Gay and MIT President Sally Kornbluth remains uncertain. Lawmakers have called for their resignations as well, and pressure is mounting on college campuses. Gay clarified Harvard's stance against calls for violence, emphasizing accountability for those threatening Jewish students. Kornbluth, while not directly addressing her testimony, urged standing against hate.

Magill's resignation prompted mixed reactions on social media. While some celebrated her departure, others decried what they perceived as the alleged censorship of pro-Palestinian voices on college campuses.

Scott Bok, citing Magill's resignation, noted external attacks and portrayed Magill as a victim of relentless pressure. He acknowledged her misstep in providing a legalistic answer to a moral question during the congressional hearing.

The fallout from Magill's resignation goes beyond an individual university, reflecting broader debates on free speech, antisemitism, and pro-Palestinian expression on college campuses. It prompts a reconsideration of how universities navigate these complex issues while upholding principles of free speech and ensuring a safe environment for all students.