Newspaper that inspires change. Breaking stories that shake the world. Be informed, Don't Settle for Fake News.

feat shape 1
feat shape 2
feat shape 3

AI bear case

Tech giants to spend $1tn on AI, but skeptics doubt transformative potential due to high costs and limited capabilities. Will it pay off?

Tech giants and other major players in the industry are projected to invest over $1 trillion in AI capital expenditures in the upcoming years, yet the return on investment remains uncertain. MIT's Daron Acemoglu and GS' Jim Covello express skepticism, with Acemoglu predicting limited economic benefits from AI in the US over the next decade and Covello questioning the technology's ability to tackle complex issues that would justify its high costs.

Acemoglu believes that the current focus and structure of generative AI technology will not lead to rapid transformative changes, estimating that only a fraction of AI-exposed tasks will be cost-effective to automate within the next decade. He also doubts that AI advancements will occur as swiftly or significantly as many anticipate, casting doubt on the potential for AI to boost US productivity and GDP growth.

Covello echoes these concerns, emphasizing the need for AI to solve intricate problems to justify its substantial expenses. He questions whether AI can achieve superintelligence and highlights the exorbitant costs associated with developing and utilizing AI technology. Despite the widespread belief in AI's transformative potential, Covello argues that the technology is not yet capable of delivering on these expectations, pointing out its limitations in basic tasks and cognitive reasoning.

The debate around AI's economic impact and transformative potential continues, with Covello cautioning against overestimating the technology's current capabilities. He emphasizes the importance of human judgment and interaction in complex tasks, casting doubt on AI's ability to replace or significantly augment human decision-making. As tech companies rush to invest in AI amid fears of missing out on the next big thing, the massive spending on AI infrastructure persists, reminiscent of past tech hype cycles that failed to live up to expectations.

Covello warns of the risks of overspending on technology that may not yield tangible benefits, drawing parallels to previous tech bubbles that ended in disappointment. Despite the current enthusiasm for AI, he remains skeptical about its ability to drive revenue growth or enhance employee performance. As the AI boom continues, the potential for a stock market bubble looms large, with uncertainties surrounding the long-term profitability of AI investments.

Share With Others

Comments on AI bear case